Legal Opinion
Chemstress Consultant Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1998No. C.A. No. 18632PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, Judge.
Defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company has appealed from an order of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that granted plaintiffs Chemstress Consultant Company, Timothy Tausch, and Steve Clark (collectively “Chemstress”) summary judgment on their claim for declaratory judgment. It has argued that the trial court incorrectly found (1) that it has a duty to defend Chemstress against a civil suit pending in Illinois and (2) that it will have a duty to indemnify Chemstress if the Illinois plaintiffs are successful. 1 This court affirms the trial court’s judgment regarding the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc. v. Franklin County Convention Facilities AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hoyle v. DTJ Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- M/g Transport Services, Inc. v. Water Quality Insurance SyndicateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Bank One, N.A. v. Echo Acceptance Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Lexington Ins. Co. v. DunnWell, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.