Legal Opinion
Mlott v. Whirlpool Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 8, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint and cross claims against defendant Whirlpool Corporation dismissed. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this products liability action to recover damages for injuries sustained when a natural gas clothes dryer, which *991had been converted to liquid propane, exploded as they started it. The dryer was manufactured by defendant Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool), converted by defendant Home Builders Supply and Hardware Corporation (Home Builders) using a conversion kit made by Whirlpool, and installed by plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Schiller v. National Presto Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Huber v. MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Falsetta v. Ronzoni Foods Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- George v. Rebbe Excavating & Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Warlikowski v. Burger King Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Warlikowski v. Burger King Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004