Legal Opinion

Burks v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 1997No. Civ. A. 95-1636PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

Presently before the court are Defendant Richard Scott’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, and separate motions for attorney’s fees and costs filed by Plaintiffs and Defendants. For the reasons stated below, Scott’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fees will be granted in part and denied in part, and Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees will be denied.

I.BACKGROUND

This ease involves a variety of claims alleging that Scott made racially discriminatory employment decisions while he was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Becker v. ARCO Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Adams v. Teamsters Local 115District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Goodman v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. Gary C. Goodman v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API