Legal Opinion

McClung v. Harris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Kay County; before Bay--ard T. Hainer, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwbll, J.:

This is an action of mandatory rtrjunc-tion from the district court of Kay county, and comes here ■ a second time on appeal, having been considered by this, court at the January, 1901, term, and in the opinion then handed down the trial court was directed to enter a certain'. judgment. When the mandate from this court reached the court below, the plaintiff presented an amended petition, setting np facts which occurred prior to the trial of the original case appealed to this court, and asked leave to file the same, and to be permitted to litigate the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SalamonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Crews v. BirdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Johnson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API