Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Zigan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2008No. 2007-1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Steven Earl Zigan of Lancaster, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0071793, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1999. From December 2, 2005, to February 13, 2006, respondent’s license to practice law was suspended due to his failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now permanently disbar respondent, based on findings that he converted a substantial amount of funds from his employer and clients, prepared false documents to conceal his theft from his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. MousheyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. WoottonOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. PooleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Adams v. MorningstarOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API