Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. Port Townsend Southern Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1895No. 1726PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Thurston County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground of a failure on the part of appellant to comply with the statute m giving an appeal bond. A bond regular in form was filed within the time prescribed by law, but an exception was taken to the sufficiency of the sureties. Instead of the sureties appearing at the time and place specified, for ex*35amination as to their sufficiency, the appellant gave a new bond. We think this was a sufficient compliance with the statute, as it was the most that could have been required of appellant in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wallace v. Oceanic Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API