Central Foam Corp. v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Iowa
1ConcurrenceUhlenhopp, Justice
The facts may be taken from the agency’s findings, as those findings have substantial evidentiary support. The problem relates to the legal conclusions to be drawn. The agency involved is the Iowa Department of Job Service.
With respect to the claimants who are still involved, the employment compensation claims may be divided into four groups: Group 1 consists of claims of employees who struck for economic benefits, Group 2 consists of claims of those who struck because they believed in good faith that employer Central Foam Corporation interfered with their union, Group 3 consists of claims of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Malone v. White Motor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.