Legal Opinion

Collier Advertising Service, Inc. v. Hudson River Day Line

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 17, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

A creditors’ bill was filed against the Hudson River Day Line on January 11, 1933. A receiver was appointed. On April 13, 1933, Bankers Trust Company, as trustee under a mortgage covering seven steamships owned by the Day Line, filed libel in rem on the admiralty side to foreclose the mortgage. Two days later the trust company filed bill on the equity side for foreclosure on nonmaritime property covered by the same mortgage. The three suits were consolidated, without prejudice to substantive rights. The matters raised by the two foreclosure suits were referred to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The J. E. RumbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. the Thomas BarlumSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Morse Drydock & Repair Co. v. Steamship Northern StarSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Central Vermont Transportation Co. v. DurningSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. The Lincoln LandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Pasquale Alberto, Debtor. Appeal of Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Gulf Coast Marine Ways, Inc. v. J. R. HardeeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1952
  3. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. Hellenic Lines LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. The Emma GilesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
  5. Maxwell v. SeelyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API