Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Cohen

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order in favor of the defendant, interpleading and substituting one Simon Sindeband in the place and stead of the said defendant in the above-entitled action.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff seeks to recover in this action the sum of $255 for commissions which he earned on the sale of certain real estate belonging to the defendant. The defendant, before answer was due, moved on affidavit and notice that one Simon Sindeband be substituted in his place herein, and that affidavit, as far as material, is as follows: “ That this action is brought to recover the sum of two hundred and fifty-five dollars * * * for alleged services rendered as a real estate broker on the sale of real estate known as Uos. 240 and 242 Clinton Street in the City of Eew York. Deponent has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore Ohio R.R. Co. v. . ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Stevenson v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Wells v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Steiner v. East River Savings InstitutionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. McCreery v. IngeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pouch v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Olsen v. MoranAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API