Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Humble

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1899No. 1,223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas. Emma Humble, the defendant in' error, brought this action against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, the plaintiff in error, to recover compensation for certain personal injuries which she sustained in the defendant’s waiting room or station at Texarkana, Ark., on April 9, 1898, while she was waiting to become a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas. Emma Humble, the defendant in' error, brought this action against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, the plaintiff in error, to recover compensation for certain personal injuries which she sustained in the defendant’s waiting room or station at Texarkana, Ark., on April 9, 1898, while she was waiting to become a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains. She attempted to take a seat in said waiting room in one of the chairs that had been provided for the use of passengers, but, owing to a defect in the…

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, Circuit Judge

At the commencement of the trial in the lower court, the defendant company asked that court to require the plaintiff’s husband to be made a party plaintiff, assigning as a reason for such motion that, if the plaintiff could recover for the injuries complained of, then her husband could also recover, and that it was desirable that he should he joined, to the end that all claims might be settled in one suit. The motion was denied, and an exception was saved. We perceive no merit whatever in this exception, as the suit was by the wife to recover for certain personal injuries which she had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Great Falls Street Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harmon v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Jordan v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Davis v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  5. Kerr-Murray Mfg. Co. v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Memphis Sav. Bank v. HouchensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Libaire v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Virginia Beach Bus Line v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  4. Lopez v. WaldrumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Lopez v. Waldrum EstateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API