Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Watson

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 12, 1953No. 11454_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

Sears, Roebuck and Co., the appellant, in 1908 adopted as a trade-mark for sporting goods “J C Higgins”, not written, printed, impressed or woven in any particular or distinctive manner, and has used it extensively. In 1948 the Company applied to the Patent Office for registration of the mark, expressly negativing that the application was under Section 2(f) of the Act, Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 60 Stat. 429, 15 U.S. C. § 1052(f) (1946), 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052(f), which authorizes registration of a mark which “has become distinctive of the applicant’s goods in commerce.” This left…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Howard Co. v. Baldwin Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
  5. In re Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of I. Lewis Cigar Mfg. CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. J. J. Yeley, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2007
  3. P.J. Fitzpatrick, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API