Legal Opinion

Fogh v. McRill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 1998No. 16-95-05218; 16-95-05220; CA A94266Published

1Opinion of the Court

956 P.2d 236 (1998)

153 Or. App. 159

Linda L. FOGH, Appellant,

v.

Errol R. McRILL, Respondent.

Errol R. McRILL, Respondent,

v.

Linda L. FOGH, Appellant.

16-95-05218, 16-95-05220; CA A94266.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted July 9, 1997.

Resubmitted February 11, 1998.

Decided March 25, 1998.

R. Daniel Lindahl, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman, P.C.

James C. Jagger, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Resubmitted In Banc February 11, 1998.

HASELTON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Warren; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Edmonds.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mustola v. ToddyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API