Legal Opinion

People v. Batista

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

Eugene J. Berkowitz, J.

Defendants Batista, Jackson and Wilson were indicted for robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree. Prior to trial defendants made Sandoval motions as to their past criminal records, which were granted on a limited basis. The issue herein raised is whether the court can grant the People’s motion to limit cross-examination as to the complaining witness’ prior bad acts which resulted in an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD) for a marihuana possession…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BatistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API