G. Seeligson & Co. v. Mitcham
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Henderson. Tried below before Hon. F. A. Williams. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chief Justice.
James A. Mitcham, the holder, brought this action against P. C. Cotton on a note executed by the latter to secure a part of the purchase money for lots 5 and 6, block 6, in the town of Athens, and to enforce a lien on the lots which was retained in the face of the deed through which the conveyance was made.
George Seeligson & Co. held a debt against Cotton secured by trust deed executed by Cotton on July 17, 1883, and with Cotton they were made defendants.
Cotton made no defense, but Seeligson & Co. alleged that the note for the purchase money for the lots ivas paid by…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Freiberg v. De LamarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Maas v. Tacquard's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903