Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Mumm

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Scott District Court. — M. F. Donegan, Judge. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

l. Landlord and taSíment f^delivery bond: validity. In March, 1915, plaintiff herein began action to recover from one Adolph Mumm a sum alleged to be due and , unpaid on account of rent of real property, and in aid of his claim sued out a landlord’s writ of attachment, which was levied upon certain personal property. The said Adolph Mumm resisted the claim, and, desiring to relieve the property from the lien of the levy before the cause came on for trial, delivered to the sheriff his bond with the present defendant as surety thereon, conditioned that, if the attachment defendant should…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garretson v. ReederSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Painter v. GibsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. New Haven Lumber Co. v. RaymondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brenton v. LewistonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API