Legal Opinion

State v. Payne, 07ap-104 (9-6-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 2007No. 07AP-104, 07AP-105PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Scott E. Payne, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common denying his "Motion to Vacate and Correct Sentence Pursuant to Criminal Rule 47." Because the trial court properly denied defendant's motion, we affirm.

{¶ 2} By indictments filed June 5, 2001 and June 8, 2001, defendant was charged with multiple counts of aggravated robbery, robbery, kidnapping, as well as single counts of assault and having a weapon under disability. A jury found defendant not guilty of assault, but guilty on all the remaining charges; the trial court sentenced…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API