Legal Opinion

Barreras v. New Mexico Corrections Department

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1992No. 19907PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

At the time of the incidents giving rise to this action plaintiffs Barreras, Buxton, and Jaramillo were employed on a probationary basis as correctional officers at the Central New Mexico Correctional Facility (CNMCf). Plaintiffs were dismissed from their employment after testing positive for use of THC. This cause of action was brought against defendants The New Mexico Corrections Department (the Department), Michael Francke and O. Lane McCotter, then employed as Secretaries of Corrections of the State of New Mexico, and Deraid Kerby, then warden at CNMCF.

I

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tri-State Generation & Transmission. Ass'n. v. D'AntonioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Zarr v. Washington Tru Solutions, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Sanchez v. Santa Ana Golf Club, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API