Legal Opinion

Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Cahal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 31, 1923No. 1034PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellees have filed a motion in this case to strike out the statement of facts, which appellants concede is well taken, but which they answer with a petition for certiorari to the lower court to have the defects in the statement of facts corrected. Also, in the event the petition should be denied, appellees have filed assignments of fundamental error, calling in review practically the same questions raised by their original brief. They conceded, on oral argument, that if reversed the only relief they could secure on a trial on the merits could be given them under their assignments of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. v. MorenoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. RayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. AndersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Lloyds Casualty Co. v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API