Legal Opinion

Pearson & Maluso, M.D., P.A. v. Bott

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1991No. 90-1534PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a temporary injunction. We quash the injunction because it was entered without proper verified pleadings or sworn evidentiary support. Additionally, the trial judge failed to make sufficient factual determinations to support the injunction. See e.g., City of Miami v. Coll, 546 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); United Steelworkers of America v. Seminole Asphalt Refining, Inc., 269 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972).

The order is quashed and this cause remanded. Should appellee submit a new, proper petition for injunctive relief the court can entertain and grant it, if it deems it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. CollDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. United Steelworkers v. Seminole Asphalt Refining, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burdick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Industrial Waste Services, Inc. v. Faircloth Sanitation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API