Commonwealth v. Epps
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
In this appeal we are called upon to determine the constitutionality of a police officer’s decision to stop a car solely because of a broken vent window. We find such a decision constitutionally permissible and affirm.
The relevant facts and procedural history giving rise to this appeal are extraordinarily easy to summarize. 1 Appellant and an accomplice smashed the rear vent window of a car which they then “hot wired” and stole. Shortly thereafter, the two were stopped in the vehicle by a police officer who had noticed the broken window of the car as appellant and his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Logan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Commonwealth v. HaywardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.