Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Doob v. Bergner

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 1898No. 2,472PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

There is in this record but one question, the solution of which depends upon the law applicable to the following facts: In April, 1890, it appears appellee, Bergner, duly qualified as a constable, with his co-appellees as sureties on his bond; that he regularly appointed William Emmel his deputy, and at the times hereinafter mentioned said Emmel was a duly qualified and acting deputy constable; that in March, 1893, one William Burnett was indebted by notes to the relator, and to secure the same executed a chattel mortgage which was recorded as the statute provides; that under the conditions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landers v. GeorgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Sparks v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Olds v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Collins v. State ex rel. HutchinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Slifer v. State ex rel. SyfersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fox v. Ohio Valley Gas Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API