Law v. Billington
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 434, April T., 1896, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1894, No. 624, on verdict for plaintiff for less than he claimed. Assumpsit to recover commissions on sales. Before Gob-don, J. At the trial it appeared that in 1890, plaintiff agreed to procure purchasers for a patented article known as the “ Globe Packing ” owned by the defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 434, April T., 1896, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1894, No. 624, on verdict for plaintiff for less than he claimed. Assumpsit to recover commissions on sales. Before Gob-don, J. At the trial it appeared that in 1890, plaintiff agreed to procure purchasers for a patented article known as the “ Globe Packing ” owned by the defendant. He was to receive as compensation commissions on all sales to such purchasers as he ■should procure. He procured as purchasers the Philadelphia, Beading Coal & Iron Company and the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Neither of the specifications of error in this case requires discussion. The court below was clearly right in refusing to permit the witness on the stand to answer the questions recited in said specifications respectively.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Mees v. GrewerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Abraham v. WorthingtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910