Legal Opinion

Mayo v. City of Sarasota

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 1987No. 86-458PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONOVER, Judge.

Appellant, Sherman Mayo, appeals from a final judgment denying his request for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, declaratory relief. We find that the trial court erred by refusing to grant appellant’s request for a writ of mandamus ordering appellee, City of Sarasota (city), to schedule a hearing before the city’s civil service board. We, accordingly, reverse.

Mr. Mayo, a fire fighter first class, was employed by the City of Sarasota on July 30, 1980. In 1983 he developed recurrent folliculitis, a condition caused by ingrown hair. Upon his doctor’s recommendation, he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arnold v. ShumpertSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. Soverino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Cbs Inc. v. International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industries, Local 644, I.A.T.S.E.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Commission v. District School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Lusker v. Guardianship of LuskerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BOARD OF TRUSTEES-CITY SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION FUND v. MendelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Willis v. Franklin Co. Bd. of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API