Mayo v. City of Sarasota
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONOVER, Judge.
Appellant, Sherman Mayo, appeals from a final judgment denying his request for a writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, declaratory relief. We find that the trial court erred by refusing to grant appellant’s request for a writ of mandamus ordering appellee, City of Sarasota (city), to schedule a hearing before the city’s civil service board. We, accordingly, reverse.
Mr. Mayo, a fire fighter first class, was employed by the City of Sarasota on July 30, 1980. In 1983 he developed recurrent folliculitis, a condition caused by ingrown hair. Upon his doctor’s recommendation, he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arnold v. ShumpertSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Soverino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Cbs Inc. v. International Photographers of the Motion Picture Industries, Local 644, I.A.T.S.E.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Commission v. District School BoardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Lusker v. Guardianship of LuskerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BOARD OF TRUSTEES-CITY SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION FUND v. MendelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Willis v. Franklin Co. Bd. of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998