Dobson v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
OliveR, Chief Judge:
The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain items invoiced as “Dinky Toys.” It was assessed for duty under paragraph 1513, Tariff Act of 1930, at the rate of 70 per centum ad valorem as “all other toys, and parts of toys, not specially provided for.” It is claimed properly dutiable under the same paragraph of the act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem as “Figures or images of animate objects, wholly or in chief value of metal.”
The pertinent parts of the paragraphs in question are as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
3Cited by12 opinions
- V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Brechner Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Louis Marx & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Sherriff-Guerringue, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.