Bobarsky v. Locust Mountain Coal Co.

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

In this case, argued with 163, October Term, we have seven assignments of error: four, characterizing the evidence insufficient to sustain the suit; two, complaining that evidence was ruled out; and one, that evidence was admitted against objection. Appellees were employed by defendant to mine anthracite coal. They sued separately for money alleged to have been earned by their joint labor. Objection to the form of action was waived.

Defendant agreed to pay “$1.55 for each car of coal cut by [plaintiff] at said mines, without the loading thereof, and sixteen cents extra to be…