Legal Opinion
Kaufman v. La Crosse Theaters Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
This appeal presents the following questions: (1) Did the parties enter into a valid brokerage contract? (2) Did the broker produce a lessee ready, willing, and able to take a lease upon the terms specified in the contract? (3) Were any of the terms of the contract ambiguous? These questions were answered in the negative by the trial court.
The listing agreement is in full as follows :
“Mr. Samuel M. Kaufman,
“740 N. Plankinton Avenue,
“Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
“Dear Sir: In consideration of your efforts to negotiate a lease of the theater properties controlled by the undersigned and located at La…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gerding v. . HaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Brest v. Maenat Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Becker v. Oregon-Kansas Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Weitbrec v. MorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Boutelle v. ChrislawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967