Legal Opinion
United States v. John Franklin Barron, Daniel James Frey, and Duane Lee Johnson, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1979No. 77-1743, 77-1744 and 77-1745PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The defendants John Franklin Barron, Daniel James Frey and Duane Lee Johnson, were named, together with four others (a total of seven), in an indictment charging various violations of 21 U.S.C. § 841, possessing with intent to distribute methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance. In addition, Johnson was charged with distributing methamphetamine and with conspiring and agreeing to distribute methamphetamine. Similarly, defendant John Franklin Barron was charged with possession, distribution, attempted distribution and conspiracy to distribute…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Donald J. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Touby, United States of America v. Lyrissa ToubyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John Mabry, Debra Mabry, and Roger SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- United States v. William SpainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Lay v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.