Legal Opinion

Hallmark v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1950No. 34011Published

1Opinion of the Court

204 Okla. 364 (1950)

230 P.2d 268

HALLMARK

v.

OKLAHOMA PUBLISHING CO. et al.

No. 34011.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

February 14, 1950.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1951.

Claud Briggs and Rollie D. Thedford, both of Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Looney, Watts, Ross, Looney & Smith, of Oklahoma City, and Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

CORN, J.

In this case J.A. Hallmark, herein referred to as petitioner, appeals from the order of the State Industrial Commission denying him compensation on a claim filed against Oklahoma Publishing Company, herein referred to as respondent, and Standard…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Okmulgee Democrat Pub Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. MolloySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Ferris v. BonitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Jones Spicer v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. World Publishing Co. v. DeloeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API