Legal Opinion
Kerouac v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided June 30, 1993No. Civ. No. 91-542-MPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McAULIFFE, District Judge.
This case arises out of a lending relationship between plaintiffs, Paul and Karen Kerouac, and Numérica Savings Bank, FSB (“Numérica”), dating back to 1981. Sometime aftér -February, 1989, plaintiffs apparently defaulted on loans extended by Numér-ica. On October 10, 1991, Numérica was declared insolvent and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) was appointed as receiver. On that same day, plaintiffs filed a writ of summons in Hillsbor-ough County (New Hampshire) Superior Court, alleging that Numérica breached duties of good faith and fair dealing,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steve Isaac v. William SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ellis v. Quincy Savings BAnkDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Homo v. Henniker, et alDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995