Legal Opinion

People v. Orr

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from court of sessions, Onondaga county. David Gr. Orr was convicted of seduction under a promise of marriage, and appeals.

1Per curiam

The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of' seduction under promise of marriage. The statute which defines and regulates that offense provides:

*399“A person who, under promise of marriage, seduces and has sexual intercourse with an unmarried female of previous chaste character, is punishable by imprisonment for not more than five years, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by both. No conviction can be had for the offense specified in section two hundred and eighty-four, upon the testimony of the female seduced, unsupported by other evidence.” Pen. Code, §§ 284,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Kenyon v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. The People v. . PlathNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Armstrong v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Hope v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lasater v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. People v. KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. People v. . TaleisnikNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API