CONROY-PEREZ v. STATE
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Dissent
KUEHN, V.P.J., DISSENTING:
¶ 1 Appellant owed $880 in District Attorney Supervision fees, and the District Attorney filed an Application to Accelerate his deferred sentence. Interestingly, the State also alleged newly committed offenses as additional grounds for accelerating Appellant's sentence, but it never introduced evidence of those offenses at the hearing. 1 As I have warned before: "To revoke an Appellant at a revocation proceeding by presenting only evidence of failure to pay without any evidence of willfulness, instead of presenting evidence in support of the more serious violation of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. EatonMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Richland v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.