In re Hogan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1987 and maintains a law office in the City of Saratoga Springs.
Respondent has admitted to charges of misconduct concerning his handling of eight client matters. We therefore grant petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues are raised in this matter and we have heard respondent in mitigation (see, 22 NYCRR 806.5).
Respondent neglected matters entrusted to him by five *870clients in violation of the attorney disciplinary rules (see, Code of Professional Responsibility DR 6-101 [a] [3] [22 NYCRR 1200.30 (a) (3)]), failed to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re StraneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008