Legal Opinion
State v. Fountain
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 2015No. 49,637-KAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
hThe defendant, Kendrick D. Fountain, was charged by bill of information with possession of a Schedule I controlled dangerous substance (marijuana) with intent to distribute, a violation of LSA-R.S. 40:966, possession of a Schedule IV controlled dangerous substance (Xanax) with intent to distribute, a violation of LSA-R.S. 40:969, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:95.1.1 Pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant pled guilty to possession of Xa-nax. In exchange for the defendant’s guilty plea, the state agreed that the defendant would receive a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Illinois v. McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. RaheemSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Louisiana v. Darrione Kentrell BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
- State v. JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019