MS v. Department of Children and Families
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
A father appeals a final judgment adjudicating his daughter a dependent. He claims that the court erred in admitting Maryland child welfare records involving his family as business records, as well as permitting the telephonic testimony of a Maryland social service witness without his consent. We agree that the records, which contained hearsay statements, were improperly admitted. Further, without the consent of both parties, the Maryland witness could not testify by telephone. Because so much of the trial court’s judgment relied on this evidence, we cannot find the errors to be harmless. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Nardone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Van Zant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Lee v. DHRSSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cole v. ColeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- A.J. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Arce v. Wackenhut Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Arce v. Wackenhut Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- N.L. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.