Zipper v. McCutcheon
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
Two points only are raised in this case. The first is that the comptroller should have allowed an exemption of the entire cost of a mausoleum directed by the deceased testatrix to be built to contain her body and that of her deceased husband, which cost amounted to $9,000; and the other point *165is that the comptroller taxed a one-half undivided interest in a piece of real estate which had been owned by the executor and the testatrix as tenants in common and which undivided one-half, belonging to the testatrix, she devised to the executor. The mausoleum item is within the language of the clause…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bankers Trust Company v. HessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. HellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Bank of Montclair v. McCutcheonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1932