Hamm v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtSidney Squire, J.
The defendant moves for an order pursuant to rule 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice, requiring claimant to serve and file an amended claim separately stating and numbering his alleged causes of action.
The attacked pleading repeatedly refers to claimant’s “ claim ” in the singular. Causes of action are not “ separately stated and numbered” (said rule 90) although paragraph 6 of the pleading alleges6. The claim is for false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and negligence.”
*216Claimant's opposing- memorandum of law maintains: “The claim arises out of an arrest, imprisonment and a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Brandt v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Oshins v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whitree v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1965