Legal Opinion

State v. Schultz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1986No. C7-86-204Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

John Schultz appeals from a conviction of failure to yield to a pedestrian in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.21, subd. 2 (1984), and from the trial court’s denial of a new trial. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting the police accident report into evidence at his trial in violation of Minn. Stat. § 169.09, subd. 13 (1984). He also claims the trial court applied the wrong standard in finding him guilty. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

This case arises out of an automobile-pedestrian accident on October 30,1985 at the intersection of Monroe Avenue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lowen v. PatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Garey v. MichelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Rockwood v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Winona National & Savings Bank v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. In Re Estate of LeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API