Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. King

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 30, 1976No. 30,574PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*5OPINION OP THE COURT

COOK, Judge:

The accused challenges his conviction for possession of a prohibited drug, Mandrax, in violation of a general regulation promulgated by Headquarters, United States Army, Europe and Seventh Army, on the ground that evidence of his possession of the substance was obtained in an illegal search.

As a result of an enlargement by the battalion commander of the discretion allowed company commanders to conduct “health and welfare inspections,” Captain Millson, commander of the accused’s company, instituted a new system of company-wide inspections. However, as these…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. RemeleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. LangeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. FleenerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. GraceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. PeeblesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. HunterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. BrunelleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API