Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 25, 2000No. 60486; CA A96871PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*544ARMSTRONG, J.
Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Branch (DMV) that denied him his requested choices for custom license plates for his state-registered passenger vehicles. He argues that the DMV rules that bar his requested messages on his custom license plates violate Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirm.
Most Oregon motor vehicles must be registered with the state and must have state-created license plates affixed to them when they are driven on public…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Ladue v. GilleoSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. ForbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Perry v. McdonaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Perry v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Martin v. STATE, DEPT. OF MOTOR VEHICLESSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. v. HolcombDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.