Legal Opinion

Sulmeyer v. State of California Department of Employment Development

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1976No. 75-1051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trastee in bankruptcy brought action against the California Department of Employment Development and the State Board of Equalization to recover, for the benefit of certain wage claimants, money paid to the state as a condition of the transfer of four on-sale liquor licenses. The district court denied recovery, and the trustee appeals. We affirm.

The trustee argues that, under both federal and state law, qualified wage claims against a bankrupt estate are entitled to priority over tax claims of the class asserted here. This is true as a general principle.1 In this case, however, the problem…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Grimes v. HoschlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In the Matter of Stanley David Leslie. Max Sobel Wholesale Liquors, Creditors-Appellants v. M. Nolden, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Elliott v. BumbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In The Matter Of Professional Bar Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API