Legal Opinion

Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. National Mortgage & Discount Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1933No. 12,925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Adams

The parties are aligned as at the trial. Plaintiff in. error will he referred to as the hank, defendant in error-as national company and Nina M. Knox and Thomas C. Knox as the mortgagors. The hank and national company respectively claim a certain fund in the hands of a receiver, which was later paid into the registry of the-court, pending its ultimate disposal. It was ordered to he paid to the national company; the claim of the bank' was dismissed and it prosecutes error. The mortgagors-assert no interest in the fund and are not parties to the present writ.

The mortgagors owned income property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plains Loan, Realty & Investment Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  2. Ahart v. SuttonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. International Trust Co. v. Stearns Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Christian v. JewellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  2. Schwab v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Baugh v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Baugh v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Walker v. FlemingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API