Legal Opinion

Smith v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1936No. 25860. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

July 31, 1931, Ruth M. Smith, who was then engaged in extrahazardous work and within the scope of the workmen’s compensation act, suffered an injury to her hand, for which, after the filing of a claim, she was allowed compensation. Under date April 22, 1932, the supervisor entered an order closing the claim, with time loss to April 19, 1932, and an award based upon a finding of five degrees permanent partial disability. No appeal was taken from this order, but June 14, 1933, Miss Smith applied for a reopening of her claim, alleging that she had suffered an aggravation of her injury since her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Taylor v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Maddox v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Maddox v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Baker v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiles v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Bates v. Board of Industrial Insurance AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. DeStoop v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API