The People v. . the Board of Metropolitan Police
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
There is an objection, aside from the merits of the controversy, that I consider fatal to the judgment. Judgment nonobstante veredicto has no place in the course of a mandamus procedure. When the return of the defendants was amended or modified, it was optional with the relator to demur or plead to all or any of the material facts contained in it; and for this purpose time was given to him. Instead of demurring, which would have brought up the question of the legal sufficiency of the return, he pleaded to it, thereby admitting that the return upon its face was a sufficient answer to the case…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The People v. . Simeon DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- The People v. . Metropolitan Police BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of Small v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Fisher v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- People Ex Rel. D., Etc., R.R. Co. v. . BatchellorNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- People Ex Rel. McDonald v. . ClausenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Stearns v. WaterlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.