Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Parker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1996No. F-94-1098Published

1ConcurrenceLane, Judge

The majority uses this case to repeal the century old rule that an Indictment or Information must allege all of the essential elements of the offense that has been in existence since before statehood. See, Parker v. Territory, 9 Okl. 109, 59 P. 9 (1899). One of the strongest pronouncements of the rules is found in Plotner v. State, 762 P.2d 936, 940-941 (Okl.Cr.1988), wherein we stated:

The basic criteria for determining the sufficiency of an Information or Indictment in Oklahoma were described in Lamb v. State, 626 P.2d 1355, 1356 (Okl.Cr.1981):

The test of the sufficiency of an Information is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pickens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. State v. SowardsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Jewell v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Richard Elmer Woodring v. United States of America, Harold Raymond Loch, Jr. v. United States of America, George Louis Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API