Legal Opinion

Davis v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 18, 1963No. [App. No. 21, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

In this application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief, the petitioner raised ten points below, which were discussed in an opinion by Judge Sodaro. The first contention was that the petitioner was convicted on evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure, and Judge Sodaro stated that the objection could not be raised in a post conviction proceeding. That statement would appear to be too broad in the light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643, because a claim of a violation of procedural due process would seem to be open under Code (1963 Supp.), Art. 27,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Leonard Hall, Jr. v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  3. Ralph v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Hunt v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Ledbetter v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Edwards v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  5. Green v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API