Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin v. Corrections Cabinet

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1991No. 91-SC-36-DGPublished

1DissentReynolds, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The appellant, at the time of her discharge, was serving as warden (an unclassified position) of a minimum security prison, when she received a letter from the Secretary of the Corrections Cabinet informing her that she was being dismissed. The pertinent part of the letter stated:

I would like to express my appreciation to you for your past years of service to the Corrections Cabinet in the unclassified service. It is necessary, however, to advise you that your services will no longer be needed in the unclassified service as Warden of the Frankfort Career Development…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. Board of Education of McCreary CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  2. Commonwealth, Transportation Cabinet v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  3. Jungbert v. MarretCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  4. Bourbon County Board of Education v. DarnabyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. Goss v. Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API