Legal Opinion

Bodwitch v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified to grant defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing complaint and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff Bodwitch, the mortgagee, commenced this action to recover the balance due on a 20-year bond and mortgage, alleging that defendant mortgagors breached a covenant which provided “[t]hat no building on the premises shall be removed or demolished without the consent of the mortgagee.” Defendants’ verified answer stated as affirmative defenses that defendants were not in default in their mortgage payments, that demolition of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sutton v. East River Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Cromwell v. . the Brooklyn Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Brayton v. PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. APF Industries, Inc. v. Mosler Safe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Property Owners Insurance Co. v. HackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Doldan v. FennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Kosiorek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Pezzi v. O'Brien & Gere, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Archer v. SkokanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API