Jaszkowiak v. Refling
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
Tbe complaint states that tbe parties hereto made a contract whereby the plaintiff was to dig, complete and equip a 4J inch '“tubular well for the defendant at the agreed price of $4 per foot and ■$150 for one 16 inch Stroke pump jack;” that the plaintiff furnished the well as agreed; that the total cost was $1,310. of which only $655 has been paid and so he demands judgment for the remainder.
Defendant admits a contract whereby the plaintiff was to drill a well for the defendant but says that it was part of the contract “that the said well would furnish not less than eighteen (18) gallons per…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carr v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Landis v. FylesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Andrieux v. KaedingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Gross v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- North Star Lumber Co. v. RosenquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nevland v. NjustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Mousel v. WidickerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. ShepardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937