Legal Opinion

Passavant v. Cantor

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order, made at the New York Special Term, denying a motion made by Herman Cantor for a bill of particulars. Tbis action was brought to set aside a general assignment made by Isaac Sickle to the above-named Herman Cantor for the benefit of the creditors of said Isaac Sickle.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order, made at the New York Special Term, denying a motion made by Herman Cantor for a bill of particulars. Tbis action was brought to set aside a general assignment made by Isaac Sickle to the above-named Herman Cantor for the benefit of the creditors of said Isaac Sickle. The assignment was attacked upon the ground that the assignor, prior to the delivery of the assignment made fraudulent reservations and secretions of a part of his property for his own benefit. An application was made to require the plaintiffs to furnish a bill of particulars, which is more particularly…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The careful opinion of the learned judge in the court below gives ample reason for the denial of the motion.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Tan Brunt, P. J., Daniels and Bartlett. JJ.

Order affirnied, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. FolsomNew York Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API