People v. Clemmons
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, after being convicted on two counts of grand theft by the court, sitting without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also a purported appeal from the “judgment.” *
Facts: On June 28, 1951, a contract was entered into between Evelyn Cozen, Don Cozen, Ann Temkin, A1 Temkin and defendant. This contract, which contemplated the build ing of an apartment house of which Mr. and Mrs. Cozen and Mr. and Mrs Temkin were to be the owners, and defendant Clemmons the general contractor, contained the following provisions:
“1. Contractor agrees to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. ProctorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.